America In Danger – The Blog

Released by William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration, in response to Governor Mike Easley and Martin Lancaster, and Erskin Bowles’s push to admit illegal aliens into NC Colleges at In-State Tuition rates.

1. In-state tuition for illegal aliens will replace American students in the very limited seats in our colleges with illegal aliens at taxpayers’ expense.

2. A huge majority of North Carolinians oppose in-state tuition for illegal aliens and to implement it against the will of the majority is to disempower our citizens and overthrow our principles of self governance and majority rule.

3. In-state tuition and college access for illegal aliens sends the wrong message, it will reward illegal alien families, as well as, attract more illegal aliens to North Carolina.

4. Allowing the illegal children of illegal aliens to receive in-state tuition benefits would be like allowing the children of bank robbers, shoplifters, and car thieves to keep their ill-gotten gains achieved by the lawbreaking of their parents.

5. North Carolinians have a birthright to decide what our educational institutions’ policies are because it has taken generations of tax funding to build our Universities.

6. Allowing illegal aliens to attend college at in-state tuition rates is a violation of Federal law established in 1996. Even Governor Mike Easley is aware of this because he stated in a Charlotte Observer Exclusive on 4/22/2005 that aiding and abetting illegal aliens to enter or remain unlawfully in the United States is also a violation of Federal Law.

7. In-state tuition rates for illegal aliens is unfair to American students from other states and the children of military families from other states present in NC who do not qualify for the huge discount.

8. Placing illegal aliens in NC Colleges will force taxpayers to train illegal aliens for jobs that are illegal for them to take. The state and taxpayers would become accessories to this crime.

America must resist protectionism. Investing in infrastructure is critical to our nation’s competitiveness. We need investment in high speed trains in America to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels, according to Mike Bloomberg, mayor of New York City.

Mr. Bloomberg’s article is rife with globalistic tendencies. More in-depth analysis coming…

read more | digg story

Elliott, in a telephone interview, told WND an amendment submitted by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, for the Department of Homeland Security 2008 budget would gut the already-approved Secure Fence Act, which was adopted with the promise hundreds of miles of physical fencing would help secure the U.S. border with Mexico.

read more | digg story

World central banks have announced that they will provide billions in loans to smaller banks in order to lower interest rates and ease the availability of credit. While this sounds good in theory, it’s more of what got the US into trouble in the first place – easy financing, with assets flowing to the lenders when the loans fail and are called in.

read more | digg story

Congress has been brought to a grinding halt by hardening Democratic and Republican stances on taxes and spending just days before lawmakers begin leaving Washington for Christmas and New Year’s. The two sides are, in some cases, refusing even to speak to each other about the massive omnibus and an Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) bill.

This gridlock means temporary relief for Americans. The politicians in DC can’t pass ridiculous legislation that would affect us on a grand scale.

read more | digg story

For those in denial about the NAFTA superhighway and the North American Union, add this bit proof to the pudding. The route will link south Texas and northeast Texas and will ultimately become part of an interstate corridor extending from the Canadian border at Port Huron, Michigan to the Texas/Mexico border. It’s also led by Cintra.

read more | digg story

Warren Buffet and Hillary Clinton say that by keeping the estate tax is a way of ensuring the United States remains a “meritocracy”. They argue that a repeal of this tax will be a windfall for wealthy families. It’s just another socialist redistribution of wealth scheme, courtesy of your government.

read more | digg story